Ethiopian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,714,298 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 23.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,569 compared to $30,644, a difference of 52.0%), median household income ($89,640 compared to $63,262, a difference of 41.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $82,821, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 123.5%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 108.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 103.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (13.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 159.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 120.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 109.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.5%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 72.5%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (61.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 94.3%), bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 84.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.47%), 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 70.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.8%).