Arapaho vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,204,615 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $50,539, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,503, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $42,357, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $73,365, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($36,586 compared to $38,285, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 87.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and single female poverty (26.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.6%), male unemployment (11.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and female unemployment (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.9%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.75, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 92.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (36.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.5%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.7%), male disability (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.1%).