Swiss vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Swiss
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Swiss
Pima
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Swiss Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,760,169 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 88.2 Pima.
Swiss vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,076 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.8%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $73,365, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.020%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $35,326, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Swiss | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,076 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,396 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,681 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,315 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,731 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,904 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,493 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,511 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $103,071 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,621 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Swiss vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 166.2%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 138.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 122.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 40.9%).
Poverty Metric | Swiss | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Swiss vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 169.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 137.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 109.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Swiss | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Swiss vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Swiss | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 72.8% |
Swiss vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 82.0%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 68.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Swiss | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
Swiss vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 80.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Swiss | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.0% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Swiss vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 60.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Swiss | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.2% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.3% |
Swiss vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | Swiss | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |