Navajo vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,201,872 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $82,821, a difference of 24.5%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $51,503, a difference of 21.5%), and median family income ($70,989 compared to $77,431, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,098 compared to $42,357, a difference of 0.62%), median earnings ($36,999 compared to $38,285, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $73,365, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (29.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 97.9%), single male poverty (25.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (23.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (30.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family poverty (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (14.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.9%), married-couple households (40.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and currently married (39.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 15.2%), college, 1 year or more (50.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and college, under 1 year (56.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.4%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability (14.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.1%).