Immigrants from Europe vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,219,485 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $30,644, a difference of 66.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,984 compared to $73,365, a difference of 52.6%), and median household income ($95,032 compared to $63,262, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $35,326, a difference of 23.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $50,539, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 146.1%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 133.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 107.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.1%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 156.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 122.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 106.7%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 81.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 97.3%), bachelor's degree (43.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 87.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 78.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%).