Chinese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,836,791 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 71.2 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $73,365, a difference of 58.3%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $63,262, a difference of 55.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $50,539, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,503, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.4%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 212.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 182.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 163.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 56.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 75.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 173.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 137.3%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 108.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.7%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 70.2%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.75, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 71.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 65.7%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 60.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 77.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.90%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.5%).