Italian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,437,786 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,574 compared to $30,644, a difference of 55.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $73,365, a difference of 50.2%), and median household income ($92,475 compared to $63,262, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $82,821, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 182.5%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 148.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 122.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 54.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 162.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 129.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 93.1%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 67.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 76.9%), bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 72.6%), and associate's degree (48.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 75.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.9%).