Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Panama

Pima

Poor
Poor
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,332,473 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 89.9 Pima.
Immigrants from Panama Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,853 compared to $30,644, a difference of 36.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.9%), and median household income ($80,873 compared to $63,262, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $82,821, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.5%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,853
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,647
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,873
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,198
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,962
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,049
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,278
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,451
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,815
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,944
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 97.5%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 83.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 39.1%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 136.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 107.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 102.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 20.1%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.0%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.5%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 50.5%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.9%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.1%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 55.9%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 54.2%), and associate's degree (44.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.37%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 59.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PanamaPima
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%