Tsimshian vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Pima
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,441,027 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.487% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 2,487.1 Pima.
Tsimshian vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,783 compared to $73,365, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($83,346 compared to $63,262, a difference of 31.8%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $30,644, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.1%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $35,326, a difference of 11.9%), and wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.1%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 146.0%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 109.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.3%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 33.9%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 108.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 103.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 91.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.5%), male unemployment (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.5%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 37.8%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 64.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.7%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Tsimshian vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 127.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |