Alsatian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,928,735 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.439% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 1,438.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $30,644, a difference of 54.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $73,365, a difference of 36.9%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $63,262, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $35,326, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 118.8%), family poverty (9.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 91.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (17.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 136.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 126.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 101.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 94.6%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.9%), family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 82.6%), bachelor's degree (41.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 76.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 42.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.3%).