Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Portugal

Pima

Poor
Poor
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,231,566 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 19.9 Pima.
Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,412 compared to $30,644, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $73,365, a difference of 35.2%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $63,262, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $50,539, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $35,326, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,412
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,984
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Average
$84,740
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Good
$47,304
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,182
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,788
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,105
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,512
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,203
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,924
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 130.1%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 95.3%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 82.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 33.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Average
13.6%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.4%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 118.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 94.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 86.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 58.3%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 42.3%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.4%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.2%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 38.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.5%), and associate's degree (40.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.3%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 69.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.85%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PortugalPima
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%