Potawatomi vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Pima

Fair
Poor
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,825,399 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 129.1 Pima.
Potawatomi Integration in Pima Communities

Potawatomi vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 31.3%), per capita income ($38,046 compared to $30,644, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $73,365, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $50,539, a difference of 7.3%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Income
Income MetricPotawatomiPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Potawatomi vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 106.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 97.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 83.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.1%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 19.9%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiPima
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Tragic
19.0%

Potawatomi vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 135.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 121.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiPima
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
11.7%

Potawatomi vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Potawatomi vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.7%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
51.5%

Potawatomi vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.78%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.9%

Potawatomi vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 37.3%), associate's degree (40.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Potawatomi vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Potawatomi vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiPima
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%