Icelander vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Icelander
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Icelanders
Pima
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Icelander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,479,480 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.593% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 593.0 Pima.
Icelander vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $30,644, a difference of 46.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $73,365, a difference of 39.4%), and median household income ($85,797 compared to $63,262, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.4%).
Income Metric | Icelander | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $44,987 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,282 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,797 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,916 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,415 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,109 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,247 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,560 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,261 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,270 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Icelander vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 152.0%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 120.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 103.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.1%).
Poverty Metric | Icelander | Pima |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Icelander vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 134.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 128.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Icelander | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Icelander vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Icelander | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 72.8% |
Icelander vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.4%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Icelander | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Icelander vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Icelander | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Icelander vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 70.4%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 67.5%), and associate's degree (48.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Icelander | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.5% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Icelander vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 65.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Icelander | Pima |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |