Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,961,017 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,027 compared to $30,644, a difference of 56.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $73,365, a difference of 46.9%), and median household income ($91,605 compared to $63,262, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $35,326, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $50,539, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 136.8%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 116.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 52.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 147.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 113.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 93.7%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 65.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 79.7%), bachelor's degree (40.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 72.2%), and associate's degree (47.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 74.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.2%).