Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,656,784 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,838 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $73,365, a difference of 34.2%), and median household income ($84,299 compared to $63,262, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.67%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $82,821, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 118.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 97.7%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 93.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.39%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 156.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 114.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 72.3%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 66.3%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 76.7%), bachelor's degree (40.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 74.0%), and associate's degree (48.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 64.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.6%).