Cuban vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,006,509 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.231% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to an increase of 231.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,383 compared to $30,644, a difference of 22.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $73,365, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($73,392 compared to $63,262, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 72.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 72.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 181.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 124.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 105.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 61.3%), births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 30.7%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (67.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 66.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 40.0%), associate's degree (41.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 38.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.7%).