Central American vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,946,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,560 compared to $30,644, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($78,803 compared to $63,262, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $73,365, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $82,821, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.2%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 63.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother poverty (31.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 131.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 100.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.6%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.73%), high school diploma (82.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 11th grade (86.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 53.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.1%).