Iroquois vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,506,568 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 132.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $30,644, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $73,365, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $50,539, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 107.2%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 71.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.8%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 132.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 105.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 60.4%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 43.1%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), disability (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%).