Celtic vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Pima
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,816,193 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.176% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 176.4 Pima.
Celtic vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $30,644, a difference of 42.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $73,365, a difference of 34.8%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $63,262, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $82,821, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Celtic vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 138.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 116.7%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 108.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.7%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.6%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Pima |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Celtic vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 152.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 116.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Celtic vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 72.8% |
Celtic vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 79.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 54.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Celtic vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 75.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Celtic vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.6%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Celtic vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 59.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), male disability (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |