Immigrants from Micronesia vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,341,320 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 241.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $30,644, a difference of 22.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $50,539, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $73,365, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.43%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $82,821, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 109.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 107.8%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 87.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 114.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 111.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 108.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.7%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 56.6%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.51%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.0%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and college, 1 year or more (54.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 7th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 47.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.77%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.9%).