Jordanian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,562,419 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.244% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 244.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $73,365, a difference of 49.1%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $30,644, a difference of 48.8%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $63,262, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.57%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $35,326, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $82,821, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 136.4%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 125.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 109.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 46.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 52.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 173.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 119.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 110.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.7%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 80.5%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 65.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 78.5%), bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 77.3%), and associate's degree (49.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 74.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 66.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%).