Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hungary
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hungary

Pima

Good
Poor
8,157
SOCIAL INDEX
79.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
84th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Hungary Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,399,736 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 22.0 Pima.
Immigrants from Hungary Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $30,644, a difference of 60.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,267 compared to $73,365, a difference of 47.6%), and median household income ($92,094 compared to $63,262, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $35,326, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,655 compared to $82,821, a difference of 23.9%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,303
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,378
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,094
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,227
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,806
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,820
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,798
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,655
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,267
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,277
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 132.5%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 119.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 102.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.8%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 47.1%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 156.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 113.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 111.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.2%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.0%), births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 73.1%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.7%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.0%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 89.7%), bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 82.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.7%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 77.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from HungaryPima
Disability
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%