Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Pima

Poor
Poor
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,871,914 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Pima.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $30,644, a difference of 34.4%), median household income ($80,341 compared to $63,262, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $73,365, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.3%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $50,539, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 72.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.0%), and family poverty (11.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.0%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 115.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 85.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.1%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 52.6%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.8%), no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 68.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 13.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 64.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 49.6%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.9%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.78%), 11th grade (89.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%