New Zealander vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,694,919 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.456% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 455.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $30,644, a difference of 65.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $73,365, a difference of 51.7%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $63,262, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,326, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $82,821, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 156.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 127.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 161.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 120.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 120.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 97.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 89.9%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.9%).