Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Taiwan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Taiwan

Pima

Exceptional
Poor
9,553
SOCIAL INDEX
93.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
13th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Taiwan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,848,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Pima.
Immigrants from Taiwan Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,742 compared to $30,644, a difference of 88.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $73,365, a difference of 84.7%), and median household income ($116,460 compared to $63,262, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $51,503, a difference of 15.4%), median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $35,326, a difference of 39.4%), and wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 39.5%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$57,742
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$136,949
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$116,460
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,151
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,031
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,256
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$59,424
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$129,122
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$135,508
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,051
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 177.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 176.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 169.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (13.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (23.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 61.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 64.6%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
Poverty
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.3%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 192.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 157.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 150.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 127.1%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 123.7%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.75, a difference of 15.7%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
Family Households
Exceptional
68.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.7%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 83.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.42%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.7%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (22.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 142.9%), doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 142.5%), and bachelor's degree (51.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
74.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
58.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
51.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (18.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 105.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 105.6%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 22.6%).
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from TaiwanPima
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%