Pennsylvania German vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,674,160 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.968. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 72.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 45.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $73,365, a difference of 25.3%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,836 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 123.6%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 108.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 102.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.1%), single female poverty (23.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and single male poverty (15.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 151.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.5%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 93.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 36.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.6%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.6%), associate's degree (37.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and bachelor's degree (28.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 83.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 61.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.63%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%).