Yup'ik vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Pima

Fair
Poor
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,525,398 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 19.2 Pima.
Yup'ik Integration in Pima Communities

Yup'ik vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $50,539, a difference of 20.2%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($73,688 compared to $82,821, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($30,518 compared to $30,644, a difference of 0.41%), median family income ($79,290 compared to $77,431, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.3%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Income
Income MetricYup'ikPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Yup'ik vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (32.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 120.3%), receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 72.3%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (18.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikPima
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Tragic
19.0%

Yup'ik vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (11.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 149.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (13.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 110.5%), and male unemployment (16.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and female unemployment (10.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.5%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikPima
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
11.7%

Yup'ik vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Tragic
72.8%

Yup'ik vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (37.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 36.6%), single father households (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (4.00 compared to 3.75, a difference of 6.7%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households (72.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 9.8%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikPima
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Yup'ik vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 224.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 48.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 47.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 48.5%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.9%

Yup'ik vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 72.0%), associate's degree (25.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), 4th grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Yup'ik vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 326.4%), ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and hearing disability (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Yup'ik vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikPima
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%