Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,265,039 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $73,365, a difference of 50.2%), per capita income ($45,195 compared to $30,644, a difference of 47.5%), and wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,936 compared to $82,821, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($48,304 compared to $38,285, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 151.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 133.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 126.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother poverty (23.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 78.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 175.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 161.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 127.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 134.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 113.1%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.75, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 102.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 71.5%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 71.0%), and associate's degree (48.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and 6th grade (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 65.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.7%).