Alaska Native vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,167,572 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $30,644, a difference of 29.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $73,365, a difference of 28.1%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $63,262, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 83.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.5%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 83.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 79.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.55%), male unemployment (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 34.4%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.5%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 177.2%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (13.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.1%).