Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Kazakhstan

Pima

Good
Poor
7,490
SOCIAL INDEX
72.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
115th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Kazakhstan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,315,649 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 33.2 Pima.
Immigrants from Kazakhstan Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $30,644, a difference of 59.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $73,365, a difference of 46.4%), and median household income ($91,015 compared to $63,262, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $35,326, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,727 compared to $82,821, a difference of 22.8%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,747
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,137
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,015
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,225
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,278
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,386
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,990
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,727
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,378
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,292
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 117.3%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 115.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 40.9%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Good
13.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 160.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 114.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.0%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.2%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.4%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 107.2%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 83.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.86%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.5%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.8%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.6%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.6%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 94.3%), bachelor's degree (43.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 87.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.0%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.6%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 72.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from KazakhstanPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%