Vietnamese vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Vietnamese

Pima

Fair
Poor
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Vietnamese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,562,802 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Vietnamese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Vietnamese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Vietnamese corresponds to a decrease of 26.5 Pima.
Vietnamese Integration in Pima Communities

Vietnamese vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,368 compared to $30,644, a difference of 38.3%), median household income ($82,248 compared to $63,262, a difference of 30.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,788 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($56,127 compared to $51,503, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,143 compared to $50,539, a difference of 11.1%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Income
Income MetricVietnamesePima
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,368
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,123
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,248
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Average
$46,172
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,525
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,377
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$56,127
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,089
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,788
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,143
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.1%

Vietnamese vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 73.8%), family poverty (11.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 59.7%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.5%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 25.0%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricVietnamesePima
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
19.0%

Vietnamese vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 119.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 112.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.8%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricVietnamesePima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
11.7%

Vietnamese vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricVietnamesePima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.6%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
72.8%

Vietnamese vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 104.6%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 70.5%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.75, a difference of 11.2%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricVietnamesePima
Family Households
Average
64.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
51.5%

Vietnamese vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 102.8%), no vehicles in household (26.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 85.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 77.0%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricVietnamesePima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
7.9%

Vietnamese vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 70.5%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 65.7%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 11th grade (89.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricVietnamesePima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.0%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Vietnamese vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.5%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 16.6%).
Vietnamese vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricVietnamesePima
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.81%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%