South American vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,721,918 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,114 compared to $30,644, a difference of 44.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,837 compared to $73,365, a difference of 37.4%), and median household income ($86,824 compared to $63,262, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,939 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $35,326, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,362 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 102.1%), family poverty (9.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 97.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 51.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 153.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.6%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 62.1%), and married-couple households (46.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 68.9%), bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 67.8%), and associate's degree (47.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 73.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%).