Immigrants from Russia vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,933,755 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $30,644, a difference of 69.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $73,365, a difference of 54.3%), and median household income ($96,378 compared to $63,262, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,503, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $35,326, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 127.2%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 123.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.7%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 46.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 155.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 123.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 113.4%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 89.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 109.8%), bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 95.7%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 78.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 66.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%).