Cherokee vs Pima Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
 Pima
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Pima
7.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Pima Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,453,063 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 4.7%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Pima | 
| Minimum | 3.1% | 3.8% | 
| Maximum | 33.3% | 29.5% | 
| Range | 30.2% | 25.7% | 
| Mean | 12.6% | 11.0% | 
| Median | 11.6% | 8.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 12.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 6.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 6.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Menominee (7.8%, a difference of 0.89%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Cajun (7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Chickasaw (8.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |