Native Hawaiian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,192,636 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 15.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $73,365, a difference of 43.3%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $63,262, a difference of 42.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $50,539, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 146.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 137.1%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 120.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 47.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 137.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 121.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 119.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.3%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 50.1%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (68.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.75, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 83.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 43.1%), associate's degree (43.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%).