Argentinean vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,574,495 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.746. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 82.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $30,644, a difference of 62.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $73,365, a difference of 50.1%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $63,262, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $35,326, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $82,821, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 124.3%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 119.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 102.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.9%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 54.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 119.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 94.7%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 71.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.6%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 96.6%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 86.5%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 82.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 72.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.8%).