Costa Rican vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,456,899 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 202.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,090 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $73,365, a difference of 40.1%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $63,262, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.1%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $35,326, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 121.6%), family poverty (9.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 103.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 46.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 152.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 113.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.8%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 57.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 62.6%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 70.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%).