Cherokee vs Pima Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Cherokee
Pima
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Cherokee
Pima
11.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
47.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Pima Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,058,144 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,518,607 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 80.7%.
![Cherokee vs Pima Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/seniors-poverty-over-65/cherokee-vs-pima-seniors-poverty-over-65-chart.webp)
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Pima |
Minimum | 2.0% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.2% | 95.6% |
Mean | 15.1% | 30.1% |
Median | 12.4% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 21.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 23.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are German Russian (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Creek (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 55.8 /100 | #170 | Average 10.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 55.1 /100 | #171 | Average 10.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 54.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.9% |
Spaniards | 50.7 /100 | #173 | Average 10.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.9% |
Creek | 49.6 /100 | #175 | Average 10.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 47.9 /100 | #176 | Average 11.0% |
Cherokee | 47.3 /100 | #177 | Average 11.0% |
German Russians | 46.9 /100 | #178 | Average 11.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 11.0% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 43.5 /100 | #180 | Average 11.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 43.4 /100 | #181 | Average 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 42.0 /100 | #182 | Average 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 11.0% |
Immigrants | France | 40.9 /100 | #184 | Average 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (20.8%, a difference of 5.2%), Puerto Rican (21.4%, a difference of 8.1%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.3%, a difference of 8.3%), Lumbee (18.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and Immigrants from Cuba (17.9%, a difference of 10.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.9% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 16.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 17.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 17.5% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 19.8% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 21.4% |