Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Pima
2,971
SOCIAL INDEX
27.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
236th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Cambodia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,102,876 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 34.9 Pima.
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $30,644, a difference of 32.0%), median household income ($83,304 compared to $63,262, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $73,365, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.9%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,434 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,222 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,304 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,090 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,594 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,833 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,450 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,533 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,537 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,580 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 102.5%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 85.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 138.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 133.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.5% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.2%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.8% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 65.2%), bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 47.3%), and associate's degree (42.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 11th grade (89.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 9th grade (92.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.4% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cambodia | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.0% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |