Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Fort Worth
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.7611168.2%32.0%(+36.2)#1133.4%(+34.8)#258
2.7611968.1%32.0%(+36.1)#1333.4%(+34.7)#267
3.7614060.2%32.0%(+28.2)#7033.4%(+26.8)#1,399
4.7617954.6%32.0%(+22.6)#14633.4%(+21.2)#2,954
5.7613149.5%32.0%(+17.5)#22733.4%(+16.1)#4,714
6.7613249.5%32.0%(+17.5)#23033.4%(+16.1)#4,725
7.7610648.7%32.0%(+16.7)#24733.4%(+15.3)#5,000
8.7610247.3%32.0%(+15.3)#29133.4%(+13.9)#5,575
9.7611645.2%32.0%(+13.2)#33133.4%(+11.8)#6,315
10.7611444.0%32.0%(+12.0)#35333.4%(+10.6)#6,799
11.7611042.5%32.0%(+10.5)#38433.4%(+9.10)#7,331
12.7611542.4%32.0%(+10.4)#39133.4%(+9.00)#7,392
13.7610842.2%32.0%(+10.2)#39933.4%(+8.80)#7,471
14.7617742.2%32.0%(+10.2)#40033.4%(+8.80)#7,488
15.7610341.3%32.0%(+9.30)#41233.4%(+7.90)#7,853
16.7612039.6%32.0%(+7.60)#44833.4%(+6.20)#8,533
17.7613337.1%32.0%(+5.10)#50933.4%(+3.70)#9,628
18.7610436.4%32.0%(+4.40)#52033.4%(+3.00)#9,934
19.7611835.7%32.0%(+3.70)#53633.4%(+2.30)#10,232
20.7610733.5%32.0%(+1.50)#58133.4%(+0.100)#11,164
21.7615531.9%32.0%(-0.100)#62633.4%(-1.50)#11,831
22.7613728.0%32.0%(-4.00)#71233.4%(-5.40)#13,311
23.7611226.4%32.0%(-5.60)#75933.4%(-7.00)#13,892
24.7612325.4%32.0%(-6.60)#78633.4%(-8.00)#14,176
25.7616424.7%32.0%(-7.30)#79933.4%(-8.70)#14,381
26.7614821.8%32.0%(-10.2)#86233.4%(-11.6)#15,377
27.7610921.6%32.0%(-10.4)#87333.4%(-11.8)#15,494
28.7610520.6%32.0%(-11.4)#90933.4%(-12.8)#16,022
29.7612919.6%32.0%(-12.4)#93633.4%(-13.8)#16,451
30.7613416.8%32.0%(-15.2)#95333.4%(-16.6)#16,717

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX are:
#1
68.2%
#2
68.1%
#3
60.2%
#4
54.6%
#5
49.5%
#6
49.5%
#7
48.7%
#8
47.3%
#9
45.2%
#10
44.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX?
76111 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX with 68.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth, TX?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Fort Worth is 37.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas is 32.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.