Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa

99.2%
20.9%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 74131 20.9% 34.1% (-13.1)#263 35.2% (-14.3)#13,744
2. 74114 22.1% 34.1% (-12.0)#284 35.2% (-13.1)#14,824
3. 74130 30.3% 34.1% (-3.79)#461 35.2% (-4.91)#21,214
4. 74108 32.2% 34.1% (-1.83)#481 35.2% (-2.96)#22,385
5. 74137 32.2% 34.1% (-1.83)#482 35.2% (-2.96)#22,386
6. 74134 34.7% 34.1% (+0.631)#511 35.2% (-0.493)#23,593
7. 74126 39.1% 34.1% (+5.04)#543 35.2% (+3.92)#25,412
8. 74128 40.3% 34.1% (+6.22)#549 35.2% (+5.09)#25,776
9. 74127 42.0% 34.1% (+7.99)#558 35.2% (+6.87)#26,275
10. 74145 42.4% 34.1% (+8.39)#562 35.2% (+7.26)#26,378
11. 74132 44.0% 34.1% (+9.90)#570 35.2% (+8.78)#26,768
12. 74112 44.1% 34.1% (+10.0)#571 35.2% (+8.88)#26,799
13. 74115 45.2% 34.1% (+11.1)#578 35.2% (+9.97)#27,080
14. 74105 45.7% 34.1% (+11.7)#580 35.2% (+10.6)#27,203
15. 74107 47.2% 34.1% (+13.2)#584 35.2% (+12.1)#27,503
16. 74135 48.1% 34.1% (+14.1)#588 35.2% (+12.9)#27,683
17. 74110 48.6% 34.1% (+14.6)#591 35.2% (+13.4)#27,757
18. 74133 48.6% 34.1% (+14.6)#592 35.2% (+13.4)#27,762
19. 74129 50.2% 34.1% (+16.2)#594 35.2% (+15.0)#28,058
20. 74104 52.6% 34.1% (+18.6)#600 35.2% (+17.5)#28,427
21. 74106 53.0% 34.1% (+18.9)#601 35.2% (+17.8)#28,483
22. 74116 55.3% 34.1% (+21.2)#606 35.2% (+20.1)#28,805
23. 74136 63.2% 34.1% (+29.1)#619 35.2% (+28.0)#29,564
24. 74146 65.3% 34.1% (+31.2)#622 35.2% (+30.1)#29,739
25. 74120 66.1% 34.1% (+32.1)#624 35.2% (+30.9)#29,807
26. 74119 75.1% 34.1% (+41.1)#627 35.2% (+39.9)#30,271
27. 74103 99.2% 34.1% (+65.1)#633 35.2% (+64.0)#30,777

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
20.9%
#3
22.1%
#4
30.3%
#5
32.2%
#6
32.2%
#7
34.7%
#8
39.1%
#9
40.3%
#10
42.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
74131 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK with 20.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa is 47.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 34.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.