Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa

100.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1.7413120.9%34.1%(-13.1)#26335.2%(-14.3)#13,744
2.7411422.1%34.1%(-12.0)#28435.2%(-13.1)#14,824
3.7413030.3%34.1%(-3.79)#46135.2%(-4.91)#21,214
4.7410832.2%34.1%(-1.83)#48135.2%(-2.96)#22,385
5.7413732.2%34.1%(-1.83)#48235.2%(-2.96)#22,386
6.7413434.7%34.1%(+0.631)#51135.2%(-0.493)#23,593
7.7412639.1%34.1%(+5.04)#54335.2%(+3.92)#25,412
8.7412840.3%34.1%(+6.22)#54935.2%(+5.09)#25,776
9.7412742.0%34.1%(+7.99)#55835.2%(+6.87)#26,275
10.7414542.4%34.1%(+8.39)#56235.2%(+7.26)#26,378
11.7413244.0%34.1%(+9.90)#57035.2%(+8.78)#26,768
12.7411244.1%34.1%(+10.0)#57135.2%(+8.88)#26,799
13.7411545.2%34.1%(+11.1)#57835.2%(+9.97)#27,080
14.7410545.7%34.1%(+11.7)#58035.2%(+10.6)#27,203
15.7410747.2%34.1%(+13.2)#58435.2%(+12.1)#27,503
16.7413548.1%34.1%(+14.1)#58835.2%(+12.9)#27,683
17.7411048.6%34.1%(+14.6)#59135.2%(+13.4)#27,757
18.7413348.6%34.1%(+14.6)#59235.2%(+13.4)#27,762
19.7412950.2%34.1%(+16.2)#59435.2%(+15.0)#28,058
20.7410452.6%34.1%(+18.6)#60035.2%(+17.5)#28,427
21.7410653.0%34.1%(+18.9)#60135.2%(+17.8)#28,483
22.7411655.3%34.1%(+21.2)#60635.2%(+20.1)#28,805
23.7413663.2%34.1%(+29.1)#61935.2%(+28.0)#29,564
24.7414665.3%34.1%(+31.2)#62235.2%(+30.1)#29,739
25.7412066.1%34.1%(+32.1)#62435.2%(+30.9)#29,807
26.7411975.1%34.1%(+41.1)#62735.2%(+39.9)#30,271
27.7410399.2%34.1%(+65.1)#63335.2%(+64.0)#30,777

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
20.9%
#3
22.1%
#4
30.3%
#5
32.2%
#6
32.2%
#7
34.7%
#8
39.1%
#9
40.3%
#10
42.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
74131 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK with 20.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Tulsa is 47.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 34.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.