Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa

2.4%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74103 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#5
2. 74110 24.2% 9.5% (+14.7)#49 10.0% (+14.3)#2,483
3. 74106 18.7% 9.5% (+9.21)#93 10.0% (+8.78)#4,249
4. 74146 17.0% 9.5% (+7.49)#117 10.0% (+7.06)#5,159
5. 74104 17.0% 9.5% (+7.47)#118 10.0% (+7.04)#5,168
6. 74115 16.8% 9.5% (+7.23)#123 10.0% (+6.80)#5,328
7. 74129 15.1% 9.5% (+5.62)#159 10.0% (+5.19)#6,459
8. 74126 13.3% 9.5% (+3.82)#190 10.0% (+3.40)#8,018
9. 74107 12.6% 9.5% (+3.11)#209 10.0% (+2.68)#8,779
10. 74127 12.4% 9.5% (+2.89)#215 10.0% (+2.46)#9,052
11. 74112 11.9% 9.5% (+2.34)#237 10.0% (+1.91)#9,696
12. 74116 10.3% 9.5% (+0.756)#285 10.0% (+0.326)#11,955
13. 74119 9.4% 9.5% (-0.092)#318 10.0% (-0.521)#13,394
14. 74128 9.3% 9.5% (-0.205)#321 10.0% (-0.634)#13,599
15. 74108 9.1% 9.5% (-0.396)#329 10.0% (-0.825)#13,905
16. 74130 8.1% 9.5% (-1.47)#373 10.0% (-1.89)#15,903
17. 74134 8.0% 9.5% (-1.54)#379 10.0% (-1.97)#16,060
18. 74105 7.6% 9.5% (-1.92)#392 10.0% (-2.35)#16,810
19. 74131 6.6% 9.5% (-2.96)#439 10.0% (-3.39)#19,025
20. 74135 6.5% 9.5% (-3.00)#441 10.0% (-3.43)#19,102
21. 74133 6.5% 9.5% (-3.01)#443 10.0% (-3.44)#19,131
22. 74114 6.1% 9.5% (-3.40)#458 10.0% (-3.83)#19,908
23. 74136 5.9% 9.5% (-3.64)#471 10.0% (-4.07)#20,428
24. 74145 5.7% 9.5% (-3.84)#477 10.0% (-4.27)#20,904
25. 74137 4.7% 9.5% (-4.86)#511 10.0% (-5.28)#23,012
26. 74120 4.5% 9.5% (-4.98)#517 10.0% (-5.41)#23,274
27. 74132 2.4% 9.5% (-7.10)#572 10.0% (-7.53)#26,680

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
100.0%
#2
24.2%
#3
18.7%
#4
17.0%
#5
17.0%
#6
16.8%
#7
15.1%
#8
13.3%
#9
12.6%
#10
12.4%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.