Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oak 80.6% 9.3% (+71.3)#1 11.3% (+69.3)#198
2. Anoka 69.2% 9.3% (+59.9)#2 11.3% (+57.9)#329
3. Inavale 62.5% 9.3% (+53.2)#3 11.3% (+51.2)#432
4. Nenzel 53.8% 9.3% (+44.5)#4 11.3% (+42.5)#707
5. Center 52.3% 9.3% (+43.0)#5 11.3% (+40.9)#761
6. South Bend 51.1% 9.3% (+41.8)#6 11.3% (+39.8)#814
7. Hazard 46.7% 9.3% (+37.4)#7 11.3% (+35.3)#1,058
8. Macy 45.4% 9.3% (+36.1)#8 11.3% (+34.1)#1,135
9. Talmage 45.4% 9.3% (+36.1)#9 11.3% (+34.0)#1,140
10. Waterbury 43.5% 9.3% (+34.2)#10 11.3% (+32.1)#1,255
11. Otoe 43.2% 9.3% (+33.9)#11 11.3% (+31.9)#1,277
12. Santee 41.7% 9.3% (+32.4)#12 11.3% (+30.3)#1,401
13. Boys Town 41.0% 9.3% (+31.7)#13 11.3% (+29.6)#1,479
14. Winnebago 36.8% 9.3% (+27.5)#14 11.3% (+25.5)#1,927
15. Republican City 36.4% 9.3% (+27.1)#15 11.3% (+25.0)#1,980
16. Hamlet 35.3% 9.3% (+26.0)#16 11.3% (+24.0)#2,113
17. Linwood 34.8% 9.3% (+25.5)#17 11.3% (+23.5)#2,171
18. Haigler 34.7% 9.3% (+25.4)#18 11.3% (+23.4)#2,189
19. Brock 34.7% 9.3% (+25.4)#19 11.3% (+23.4)#2,193
20. Bushnell 34.1% 9.3% (+24.8)#20 11.3% (+22.8)#2,270
21. Poole 33.3% 9.3% (+24.0)#21 11.3% (+22.0)#2,406
22. Hubbell 32.3% 9.3% (+22.9)#22 11.3% (+20.9)#2,561
23. Terrytown 31.5% 9.3% (+22.2)#23 11.3% (+20.2)#2,696
24. Rogers 31.4% 9.3% (+22.1)#24 11.3% (+20.0)#2,719
25. Minatare 31.2% 9.3% (+21.9)#25 11.3% (+19.9)#2,741
26. Phillips 29.0% 9.3% (+19.7)#26 11.3% (+17.6)#3,210
27. Liberty 28.6% 9.3% (+19.3)#27 11.3% (+17.2)#3,318
28. Alda 27.0% 9.3% (+17.7)#28 11.3% (+15.7)#3,694
29. Upland 26.7% 9.3% (+17.4)#29 11.3% (+15.3)#3,790
30. Ayr 25.4% 9.3% (+16.1)#30 11.3% (+14.1)#4,177
31. Tekamah 25.3% 9.3% (+16.0)#31 11.3% (+14.0)#4,194
32. Curtis 24.8% 9.3% (+15.5)#32 11.3% (+13.5)#4,394
33. Alexandria 24.1% 9.3% (+14.8)#33 11.3% (+12.7)#4,663
34. Magnet 24.0% 9.3% (+14.7)#34 11.3% (+12.7)#4,695
35. Ewing 23.6% 9.3% (+14.3)#35 11.3% (+12.3)#4,843
36. Gresham 23.6% 9.3% (+14.3)#36 11.3% (+12.3)#4,846
37. Clarkson 23.6% 9.3% (+14.3)#37 11.3% (+12.2)#4,865
38. Crawford 23.3% 9.3% (+14.0)#38 11.3% (+11.9)#4,994
39. Dunning 22.9% 9.3% (+13.5)#39 11.3% (+11.5)#5,141
40. Peru 22.7% 9.3% (+13.4)#40 11.3% (+11.4)#5,223
41. Farnam 22.4% 9.3% (+13.1)#41 11.3% (+11.0)#5,367
42. Wolbach 22.3% 9.3% (+13.0)#42 11.3% (+11.0)#5,400
43. Seneca 22.2% 9.3% (+12.9)#43 11.3% (+10.9)#5,450
44. Crookston 22.2% 9.3% (+12.9)#44 11.3% (+10.9)#5,451
45. Broken Bow 21.5% 9.3% (+12.2)#45 11.3% (+10.2)#5,789
46. Holdrege 21.5% 9.3% (+12.2)#46 11.3% (+10.1)#5,794
47. Arthur 21.4% 9.3% (+12.1)#47 11.3% (+10.1)#5,823
48. Orchard 21.4% 9.3% (+12.1)#48 11.3% (+10.1)#5,839
49. Ashton 21.2% 9.3% (+11.9)#49 11.3% (+9.83)#5,938
50. Wayne 21.0% 9.3% (+11.7)#50 11.3% (+9.69)#6,005
51. Sprague 20.8% 9.3% (+11.4)#51 11.3% (+9.41)#6,144
52. Glenvil 20.7% 9.3% (+11.4)#52 11.3% (+9.35)#6,172
53. Royal 20.5% 9.3% (+11.2)#53 11.3% (+9.17)#6,259
54. Steinauer 20.4% 9.3% (+11.1)#54 11.3% (+9.07)#6,326
55. Verdigre 20.1% 9.3% (+10.8)#55 11.3% (+8.79)#6,438
56. Plymouth 20.0% 9.3% (+10.7)#56 11.3% (+8.66)#6,502
57. Abie 20.0% 9.3% (+10.7)#57 11.3% (+8.66)#6,534
58. Oxford 20.0% 9.3% (+10.6)#58 11.3% (+8.62)#6,553
59. Bee 19.8% 9.3% (+10.5)#59 11.3% (+8.51)#6,594
60. Union 19.7% 9.3% (+10.4)#60 11.3% (+8.37)#6,676
61. Blue Springs 19.5% 9.3% (+10.2)#61 11.3% (+8.17)#6,799
62. Fullerton 19.5% 9.3% (+10.2)#62 11.3% (+8.17)#6,801
63. Belvidere 19.4% 9.3% (+10.1)#63 11.3% (+8.10)#6,840
64. Hardy 18.9% 9.3% (+9.58)#64 11.3% (+7.55)#7,147
65. Roca 18.8% 9.3% (+9.52)#65 11.3% (+7.48)#7,196
66. Beaver City 18.8% 9.3% (+9.47)#66 11.3% (+7.44)#7,223
67. Holbrook 18.7% 9.3% (+9.40)#67 11.3% (+7.36)#7,277
68. Harrison 18.5% 9.3% (+9.24)#68 11.3% (+7.21)#7,385
69. Sunol 18.4% 9.3% (+9.08)#69 11.3% (+7.05)#7,469
70. Tilden 18.1% 9.3% (+8.83)#70 11.3% (+6.79)#7,640
71. Western 18.1% 9.3% (+8.79)#71 11.3% (+6.75)#7,668
72. Lexington 18.1% 9.3% (+8.77)#72 11.3% (+6.74)#7,684
73. Stella 17.9% 9.3% (+8.60)#73 11.3% (+6.57)#7,794
74. Reynolds 17.9% 9.3% (+8.55)#74 11.3% (+6.52)#7,842
75. Beaver Crossing 17.7% 9.3% (+8.43)#75 11.3% (+6.40)#7,917
76. Hayes Center 17.6% 9.3% (+8.34)#76 11.3% (+6.31)#7,985
77. Diller 17.6% 9.3% (+8.25)#77 11.3% (+6.22)#8,044
78. Octavia 17.4% 9.3% (+8.13)#78 11.3% (+6.10)#8,133
79. Humboldt 17.2% 9.3% (+7.93)#79 11.3% (+5.89)#8,279
80. Malcolm 17.1% 9.3% (+7.76)#80 11.3% (+5.72)#8,385
81. Cody 17.0% 9.3% (+7.71)#81 11.3% (+5.68)#8,412
82. Lodgepole 17.0% 9.3% (+7.66)#82 11.3% (+5.62)#8,440
83. Beatrice 16.8% 9.3% (+7.45)#83 11.3% (+5.42)#8,579
84. Max 16.7% 9.3% (+7.36)#84 11.3% (+5.33)#8,639
85. Crab Orchard 16.7% 9.3% (+7.36)#85 11.3% (+5.33)#8,663
86. Mitchell 16.5% 9.3% (+7.22)#86 11.3% (+5.18)#8,749
87. Litchfield 16.3% 9.3% (+6.94)#87 11.3% (+4.91)#8,939
88. Thurston 16.1% 9.3% (+6.82)#88 11.3% (+4.79)#9,027
89. Auburn 16.0% 9.3% (+6.74)#89 11.3% (+4.71)#9,094
90. Dannebrog 15.8% 9.3% (+6.52)#90 11.3% (+4.49)#9,246
91. Burchard 15.8% 9.3% (+6.48)#91 11.3% (+4.45)#9,280
92. Nickerson 15.8% 9.3% (+6.45)#92 11.3% (+4.42)#9,300
93. Hay Springs 15.6% 9.3% (+6.30)#93 11.3% (+4.26)#9,436
94. Allen 15.6% 9.3% (+6.29)#94 11.3% (+4.25)#9,448
95. Craig 15.5% 9.3% (+6.17)#95 11.3% (+4.13)#9,552
96. Cedar Rapids 15.5% 9.3% (+6.15)#96 11.3% (+4.12)#9,571
97. Martinsburg 15.2% 9.3% (+5.84)#97 11.3% (+3.81)#9,792
98. Spalding 15.1% 9.3% (+5.78)#98 11.3% (+3.74)#9,839
99. Oconto 15.1% 9.3% (+5.75)#99 11.3% (+3.71)#9,861
100. Gordon 15.1% 9.3% (+5.74)#100 11.3% (+3.71)#9,863

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska are:
#1
80.6%
#2
69.2%
#3
62.5%
#4
53.8%
#5
52.3%
#6
51.1%
#7
46.7%
#8
45.4%
#9
45.4%
#10
43.5%
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska?
Oak has the Highest Male Poverty Level in Nebraska with 80.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Males in Nebraska is 9.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.