Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Larson 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 11.3% (+88.7)#118
2. Hannah 72.7% 9.8% (+63.0)#2 11.3% (+61.4)#277
3. Mandaree 57.2% 9.8% (+47.4)#3 11.3% (+45.8)#581
4. Pillsbury 57.1% 9.8% (+47.4)#4 11.3% (+45.8)#585
5. Cannon Ball 55.0% 9.8% (+45.2)#5 11.3% (+43.6)#667
6. Warwick 51.7% 9.8% (+41.9)#6 11.3% (+40.3)#791
7. Luverne 50.0% 9.8% (+40.2)#7 11.3% (+38.7)#881
8. Upham 48.5% 9.8% (+38.7)#8 11.3% (+37.1)#953
9. Mchenry 48.3% 9.8% (+38.5)#9 11.3% (+36.9)#964
10. Fort Totten 48.3% 9.8% (+38.5)#10 11.3% (+36.9)#965
11. Fortuna 41.9% 9.8% (+32.2)#11 11.3% (+30.6)#1,381
12. Hamberg 40.0% 9.8% (+30.2)#12 11.3% (+28.7)#1,578
13. Amidon 38.9% 9.8% (+29.1)#13 11.3% (+27.5)#1,690
14. East Dunseith 38.4% 9.8% (+28.6)#14 11.3% (+27.0)#1,751
15. York 36.4% 9.8% (+26.6)#15 11.3% (+25.0)#1,983
16. Overly 33.3% 9.8% (+23.6)#16 11.3% (+22.0)#2,404
17. New Leipzig 33.0% 9.8% (+23.2)#17 11.3% (+21.6)#2,449
18. Belcourt 32.6% 9.8% (+22.9)#18 11.3% (+21.3)#2,504
19. Green Acres 31.8% 9.8% (+22.1)#19 11.3% (+20.5)#2,633
20. Bowdon 31.6% 9.8% (+21.8)#20 11.3% (+20.2)#2,681
21. Esmond 30.6% 9.8% (+20.9)#21 11.3% (+19.3)#2,852
22. Dodge 29.8% 9.8% (+20.1)#22 11.3% (+18.5)#3,017
23. Ryder 29.2% 9.8% (+19.4)#23 11.3% (+17.8)#3,168
24. Solen 28.9% 9.8% (+19.2)#24 11.3% (+17.6)#3,218
25. De Lamere 28.6% 9.8% (+18.8)#25 11.3% (+17.2)#3,321
26. Lankin 28.1% 9.8% (+18.4)#26 11.3% (+16.8)#3,409
27. Grenora 28.0% 9.8% (+18.3)#27 11.3% (+16.7)#3,437
28. Verona 27.9% 9.8% (+18.2)#28 11.3% (+16.6)#3,458
29. Bisbee 27.8% 9.8% (+18.0)#29 11.3% (+16.4)#3,498
30. Parshall 27.7% 9.8% (+17.9)#30 11.3% (+16.3)#3,529
31. Fort Yates 27.3% 9.8% (+17.5)#31 11.3% (+15.9)#3,629
32. Four Bears Village 27.0% 9.8% (+17.2)#32 11.3% (+15.6)#3,706
33. Ardoch 26.7% 9.8% (+16.9)#33 11.3% (+15.3)#3,794
34. Butte 26.5% 9.8% (+16.8)#34 11.3% (+15.2)#3,828
35. Drake 26.0% 9.8% (+16.3)#35 11.3% (+14.7)#3,993
36. Pisek 25.4% 9.8% (+15.7)#36 11.3% (+14.1)#4,169
37. Pettibone 25.0% 9.8% (+15.2)#37 11.3% (+13.7)#4,346
38. Litchville 24.3% 9.8% (+14.6)#38 11.3% (+13.0)#4,575
39. Elgin 24.2% 9.8% (+14.4)#39 11.3% (+12.8)#4,620
40. Elliott 23.5% 9.8% (+13.8)#40 11.3% (+12.2)#4,882
41. Walhalla 23.3% 9.8% (+13.6)#41 11.3% (+12.0)#4,954
42. Ruthville 23.3% 9.8% (+13.5)#42 11.3% (+11.9)#4,981
43. Sarles 23.1% 9.8% (+13.3)#43 11.3% (+11.7)#5,051
44. Shell Valley 22.9% 9.8% (+13.2)#44 11.3% (+11.6)#5,115
45. Beach 22.8% 9.8% (+13.1)#45 11.3% (+11.5)#5,156
46. Medina 22.7% 9.8% (+13.0)#46 11.3% (+11.4)#5,210
47. Devils Lake 22.6% 9.8% (+12.8)#47 11.3% (+11.2)#5,292
48. Glen Ullin 22.2% 9.8% (+12.5)#48 11.3% (+10.9)#5,426
49. Regent 22.2% 9.8% (+12.5)#49 11.3% (+10.9)#5,440
50. Rolette 22.1% 9.8% (+12.3)#50 11.3% (+10.7)#5,526
51. Lignite 21.4% 9.8% (+11.7)#51 11.3% (+10.1)#5,820
52. Springbrook 21.4% 9.8% (+11.7)#52 11.3% (+10.1)#5,828
53. Center 20.6% 9.8% (+10.9)#53 11.3% (+9.28)#6,213
54. Pick City 20.4% 9.8% (+10.7)#54 11.3% (+9.07)#6,325
55. New Town 20.3% 9.8% (+10.6)#55 11.3% (+8.98)#6,366
56. Sheyenne 20.0% 9.8% (+10.2)#56 11.3% (+8.66)#6,512
57. Mooreton 20.0% 9.8% (+10.2)#57 11.3% (+8.66)#6,516
58. Nome 20.0% 9.8% (+10.2)#58 11.3% (+8.66)#6,536
59. Porcupine 19.6% 9.8% (+9.89)#59 11.3% (+8.30)#6,711
60. Hunter 19.6% 9.8% (+9.88)#60 11.3% (+8.29)#6,717
61. St John 19.5% 9.8% (+9.78)#61 11.3% (+8.19)#6,783
62. Minto 19.0% 9.8% (+9.25)#62 11.3% (+7.66)#7,069
63. Canton City Hensel 18.8% 9.8% (+8.99)#63 11.3% (+7.41)#7,259
64. Coleharbor 18.4% 9.8% (+8.61)#64 11.3% (+7.03)#7,486
65. Ashley 18.3% 9.8% (+8.53)#65 11.3% (+6.95)#7,536
66. Loma 18.2% 9.8% (+8.43)#66 11.3% (+6.84)#7,614
67. Venturia 18.2% 9.8% (+8.43)#67 11.3% (+6.84)#7,619
68. Wahpeton 18.0% 9.8% (+8.22)#68 11.3% (+6.63)#7,760
69. Belfield 17.9% 9.8% (+8.16)#69 11.3% (+6.58)#7,792
70. Hazelton 17.9% 9.8% (+8.13)#70 11.3% (+6.54)#7,815
71. Mott 17.9% 9.8% (+8.10)#71 11.3% (+6.52)#7,834
72. Wishek 17.8% 9.8% (+8.07)#72 11.3% (+6.48)#7,864
73. Lehr 17.5% 9.8% (+7.74)#73 11.3% (+6.16)#8,088
74. Scranton 17.2% 9.8% (+7.49)#74 11.3% (+5.90)#8,264
75. Pingree 17.2% 9.8% (+7.49)#75 11.3% (+5.90)#8,272
76. Tuttle 17.1% 9.8% (+7.39)#76 11.3% (+5.80)#8,335
77. Maddock 17.0% 9.8% (+7.21)#77 11.3% (+5.63)#8,437
78. Dunseith 16.7% 9.8% (+6.96)#78 11.3% (+5.37)#8,599
79. Gascoyne 16.7% 9.8% (+6.91)#79 11.3% (+5.33)#8,666
80. Leal 16.7% 9.8% (+6.91)#80 11.3% (+5.33)#8,674
81. Zeeland 16.1% 9.8% (+6.37)#81 11.3% (+4.79)#9,028
82. Hoople 16.1% 9.8% (+6.35)#82 11.3% (+4.76)#9,048
83. Gladstone 16.1% 9.8% (+6.30)#83 11.3% (+4.72)#9,087
84. Tappen 15.8% 9.8% (+6.00)#84 11.3% (+4.41)#9,306
85. Grand Forks 15.5% 9.8% (+5.74)#85 11.3% (+4.16)#9,530
86. Selfridge 15.5% 9.8% (+5.72)#86 11.3% (+4.13)#9,551
87. Neche 15.5% 9.8% (+5.70)#87 11.3% (+4.11)#9,577
88. Bottineau 15.4% 9.8% (+5.68)#88 11.3% (+4.10)#9,585
89. Hansboro 15.4% 9.8% (+5.63)#89 11.3% (+4.04)#9,634
90. Carson 15.3% 9.8% (+5.57)#90 11.3% (+3.99)#9,663
91. Ellendale 15.3% 9.8% (+5.54)#91 11.3% (+3.96)#9,680
92. Powers Lake 15.1% 9.8% (+5.32)#92 11.3% (+3.74)#9,841
93. Garrison 15.1% 9.8% (+5.31)#93 11.3% (+3.72)#9,855
94. Ambrose 15.0% 9.8% (+5.24)#94 11.3% (+3.66)#9,903
95. Sherwood 15.0% 9.8% (+5.21)#95 11.3% (+3.62)#9,933
96. Dunn Center 14.8% 9.8% (+5.00)#96 11.3% (+3.42)#10,092
97. Rolla 14.6% 9.8% (+4.88)#97 11.3% (+3.30)#10,197
98. Gackle 14.6% 9.8% (+4.81)#98 11.3% (+3.23)#10,263
99. Flasher 14.4% 9.8% (+4.65)#99 11.3% (+3.07)#10,385
100. Fessenden 14.3% 9.8% (+4.58)#100 11.3% (+3.00)#10,446

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
72.7%
#3
57.2%
#4
57.1%
#5
55.0%
#6
51.7%
#7
50.0%
#8
48.5%
#9
48.3%
#10
48.3%
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota?
Larson has the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Males in North Dakota is 9.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.