Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Manderson White Horse Creek 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.3% (+88.7)#5
2. Wounded Knee 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 11.3% (+88.7)#9
3. Swift Bird 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#3 11.3% (+88.7)#19
4. Brentwood Colony 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#4 11.3% (+88.7)#50
5. Mayfield Colony 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#5 11.3% (+88.7)#58
6. Ideal 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#6 11.3% (+88.7)#60
7. Onaka 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#7 11.3% (+88.7)#92
8. Soldier Creek 92.2% 11.0% (+81.2)#8 11.3% (+80.9)#134
9. Bridger 90.3% 11.0% (+79.3)#9 11.3% (+79.0)#142
10. Norris 90.1% 11.0% (+79.1)#10 11.3% (+78.8)#143
11. Corn Creek 89.1% 11.0% (+78.2)#11 11.3% (+77.8)#150
12. Horse Creek 86.8% 11.0% (+75.8)#12 11.3% (+75.5)#161
13. Porcupine 85.9% 11.0% (+74.9)#13 11.3% (+74.6)#165
14. La Plant 85.6% 11.0% (+74.7)#14 11.3% (+74.3)#168
15. Two Strike 81.2% 11.0% (+70.2)#15 11.3% (+69.8)#193
16. Wakpala 78.1% 11.0% (+67.2)#16 11.3% (+66.8)#209
17. Little Eagle 77.7% 11.0% (+66.7)#17 11.3% (+66.4)#214
18. Enemy Swim 75.0% 11.0% (+64.0)#18 11.3% (+63.7)#243
19. Marty 74.7% 11.0% (+63.7)#19 11.3% (+63.3)#252
20. Parmelee 72.7% 11.0% (+61.7)#20 11.3% (+61.4)#278
21. Bullhead 72.4% 11.0% (+61.4)#21 11.3% (+61.0)#280
22. Antelope 70.9% 11.0% (+59.9)#22 11.3% (+59.6)#296
23. Peever Flats 69.4% 11.0% (+58.4)#23 11.3% (+58.0)#328
24. Okreek 66.7% 11.0% (+55.7)#24 11.3% (+55.3)#360
25. Long Hollow 65.6% 11.0% (+54.7)#25 11.3% (+54.3)#380
26. Clark Colony 60.0% 11.0% (+49.0)#26 11.3% (+48.7)#503
27. Kyle 58.1% 11.0% (+47.1)#27 11.3% (+46.8)#565
28. Rosebud 57.0% 11.0% (+46.0)#28 11.3% (+45.6)#587
29. Sicangu 55.4% 11.0% (+44.4)#29 11.3% (+44.1)#649
30. New Witten 51.4% 11.0% (+40.4)#30 11.3% (+40.0)#799
31. West Brule 50.9% 11.0% (+39.9)#31 11.3% (+39.6)#826
32. Lower Brule 50.7% 11.0% (+39.7)#32 11.3% (+39.3)#837
33. Wanblee 50.6% 11.0% (+39.7)#33 11.3% (+39.3)#840
34. White Rock 50.0% 11.0% (+39.0)#34 11.3% (+38.7)#888
35. Pine Ridge 49.1% 11.0% (+38.1)#35 11.3% (+37.8)#922
36. Oglala 48.5% 11.0% (+37.5)#36 11.3% (+37.2)#951
37. St Francis 46.1% 11.0% (+35.1)#37 11.3% (+34.7)#1,100
38. Eagle Butte 44.6% 11.0% (+33.6)#38 11.3% (+33.3)#1,179
39. Fort Thompson 44.6% 11.0% (+33.6)#39 11.3% (+33.3)#1,180
40. Peever 43.5% 11.0% (+32.6)#40 11.3% (+32.2)#1,251
41. Aurora Center 42.1% 11.0% (+31.1)#41 11.3% (+30.8)#1,370
42. North Eagle Butte 40.0% 11.0% (+29.0)#42 11.3% (+28.6)#1,581
43. Mission 39.2% 11.0% (+28.2)#43 11.3% (+27.8)#1,650
44. Avon 38.9% 11.0% (+27.9)#44 11.3% (+27.6)#1,681
45. Dupree 38.6% 11.0% (+27.7)#45 11.3% (+27.3)#1,720
46. Golden View Colony 37.8% 11.0% (+26.9)#46 11.3% (+26.5)#1,800
47. Allen 37.8% 11.0% (+26.8)#47 11.3% (+26.4)#1,812
48. Cherry Creek 37.8% 11.0% (+26.8)#48 11.3% (+26.4)#1,814
49. White River 36.9% 11.0% (+25.9)#49 11.3% (+25.6)#1,919
50. Bryant 36.9% 11.0% (+25.9)#50 11.3% (+25.5)#1,921
51. Spring Creek Colony 34.2% 11.0% (+23.2)#51 11.3% (+22.9)#2,260
52. Naples 32.4% 11.0% (+21.4)#52 11.3% (+21.0)#2,542
53. Bonesteel 32.3% 11.0% (+21.3)#53 11.3% (+21.0)#2,550
54. Lake Andes 32.2% 11.0% (+21.3)#54 11.3% (+20.9)#2,565
55. Batesland 30.2% 11.0% (+19.2)#55 11.3% (+18.8)#2,938
56. Edgemont 29.6% 11.0% (+18.6)#56 11.3% (+18.2)#3,071
57. New Underwood 28.9% 11.0% (+18.0)#57 11.3% (+17.6)#3,214
58. White Horse 28.8% 11.0% (+17.9)#58 11.3% (+17.5)#3,243
59. Spring Creek 28.7% 11.0% (+17.7)#59 11.3% (+17.3)#3,280
60. Wood 28.6% 11.0% (+17.6)#60 11.3% (+17.2)#3,316
61. Ashland Heights 28.2% 11.0% (+17.2)#61 11.3% (+16.9)#3,394
62. Lake City 28.1% 11.0% (+17.2)#62 11.3% (+16.8)#3,413
63. Murdo 27.0% 11.0% (+16.0)#63 11.3% (+15.6)#3,718
64. Hot Springs 26.7% 11.0% (+15.7)#64 11.3% (+15.3)#3,785
65. Colome 26.1% 11.0% (+15.1)#65 11.3% (+14.8)#3,960
66. Vale 25.0% 11.0% (+14.0)#66 11.3% (+13.7)#4,339
67. Ortley 25.0% 11.0% (+14.0)#67 11.3% (+13.7)#4,350
68. Camp Crook 25.0% 11.0% (+14.0)#68 11.3% (+13.7)#4,354
69. Burke 24.3% 11.0% (+13.4)#69 11.3% (+13.0)#4,571
70. Sisseton 24.0% 11.0% (+13.0)#70 11.3% (+12.6)#4,699
71. Waverly 23.8% 11.0% (+12.8)#71 11.3% (+12.5)#4,777
72. Forestburg 23.3% 11.0% (+12.4)#72 11.3% (+12.0)#4,962
73. Vermillion 23.2% 11.0% (+12.2)#73 11.3% (+11.9)#5,018
74. Agency Village 23.2% 11.0% (+12.2)#74 11.3% (+11.8)#5,021
75. Roscoe 22.7% 11.0% (+11.7)#75 11.3% (+11.4)#5,226
76. Brandt 22.6% 11.0% (+11.6)#76 11.3% (+11.2)#5,283
77. Howard 22.5% 11.0% (+11.5)#77 11.3% (+11.2)#5,302
78. Winner 22.4% 11.0% (+11.4)#78 11.3% (+11.1)#5,345
79. Whitehorse 22.4% 11.0% (+11.4)#79 11.3% (+11.0)#5,369
80. Fedora 22.2% 11.0% (+11.2)#80 11.3% (+10.9)#5,453
81. Big Stone City 22.0% 11.0% (+11.1)#81 11.3% (+10.7)#5,532
82. Green Valley 21.6% 11.0% (+10.6)#82 11.3% (+10.2)#5,763
83. Summit 21.4% 11.0% (+10.4)#83 11.3% (+10.0)#5,841
84. Fruitdale 20.8% 11.0% (+9.81)#84 11.3% (+9.44)#6,140
85. Philip 20.7% 11.0% (+9.68)#85 11.3% (+9.31)#6,193
86. Chancellor 20.6% 11.0% (+9.61)#86 11.3% (+9.25)#6,224
87. Delmont 20.6% 11.0% (+9.61)#87 11.3% (+9.25)#6,226
88. Vienna 20.0% 11.0% (+9.03)#88 11.3% (+8.66)#6,524
89. Nisland 19.6% 11.0% (+8.65)#89 11.3% (+8.28)#6,723
90. Armour 19.6% 11.0% (+8.64)#90 11.3% (+8.27)#6,731
91. New Effington 19.5% 11.0% (+8.57)#91 11.3% (+8.20)#6,776
92. Lemmon 19.5% 11.0% (+8.48)#92 11.3% (+8.11)#6,824
93. Richland 19.0% 11.0% (+8.03)#93 11.3% (+7.66)#7,072
94. Wakonda 18.6% 11.0% (+7.62)#94 11.3% (+7.25)#7,361
95. Faith 18.4% 11.0% (+7.39)#95 11.3% (+7.03)#7,479
96. Mitchell 18.1% 11.0% (+7.14)#96 11.3% (+6.77)#7,655
97. Conde 18.0% 11.0% (+7.03)#97 11.3% (+6.66)#7,738
98. Mound City 18.0% 11.0% (+7.03)#98 11.3% (+6.66)#7,740
99. Tulare 17.9% 11.0% (+6.97)#99 11.3% (+6.61)#7,774
100. Fairburn 17.6% 11.0% (+6.67)#100 11.3% (+6.31)#7,996

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota are:
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota?
Manderson White Horse Creek has the Highest Male Poverty Level in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Males in South Dakota is 11.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.