Chilean vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,643,945 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 50.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $50,575, a difference of 8.9%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $61,199, a difference of 7.4%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $115,230, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.21%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $42,446, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $111,286, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.66%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.4%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%).