Immigrants from Peru vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,036,323 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 2.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,852 compared to $50,575, a difference of 15.3%), median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $61,199, a difference of 11.9%), and median family income ($103,534 compared to $115,230, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $42,446, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $95,146, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 28.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and family households (67.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%).