Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,256,631 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 90.9 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $67,333, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and median family income ($110,137 compared to $115,230, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $42,446, a difference of 0.14%), householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($50,225 compared to $51,246, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.0%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.0%).