Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
New Zealander
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
New Zealanders
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs New Zealander Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,895,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.57%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 21.4% |
| Range | 23.5% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 9.7% |
| Median | 10.8% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and New Zealanders by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |