Immigrants from Laos vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,591,182 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 6.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $50,575, a difference of 33.6%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $115,230, a difference of 24.9%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $61,199, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $53,294, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $42,446, a difference of 15.2%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 83.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 82.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.6%).